Seeing Straight At The Border

Avatar photo

There have been some funny things going on at the border the last couple of years. It would be fair to say things are not as they seem.

For example, while any transborder trucker would tell you business has been on the decline since about the fourth quarter of 2006, the statistics don’t bear that out. The rising value of energy exports from western Canada for much of 2007 and 2008 served to mask the consistently declining volumes of exports from the manufacturing sector in central Canada. While to many politicians an export is an export, the reality for motor carriers, and those based in central Canada in particular, is that the demise of manufacturing exports is a serious issue that requires addressing.

The other mirage at the border is that more than seven years after 9/11 and the myriad of security programs that were spawned, it is actually getting easier to cross it. Certainly the extended border delays that frazzled the nerves of transborder truckers for years have eased. But, as the Canadian Trucking Alliance (CTA) pointed out when it recently appeared before the House of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade, this should not be taken as any indication that all is now running smoothly.

All it shows is a temporary reprieve caused by the drop in truck traffic crossing the border.

The problems that have thickened the border in recent years – inconsistency between US and Canadian regulations, border guard staffing issues and inadequate infrastructure -have not been solved. In fact, CTA argues that despite the drastic drop-off in volumes, border processing times have barely changed at all.

When the North American economy eventually recovers, the problems that plagued motor carriers and their exporter customers will quickly rise to the surface and will do so at a time when we can least afford any obstacles to what may prove to be a fragile recovery for our beleaguered manufacturing sector.

And things could get worse if legislation currently being considered by our own government is adopted. The Canadian Border Services Agency is proposing to

turn back trucks if the importer data has not yet been received before the truck arrived at the border. The truck would no longer be moved in-bond to an inland facility for clearance.

What should be done? A huge part of the problem at the border stems from the fact there are too many government agencies involved in setting legislation. As David Bradley, the head of the CTA points out, it can be a challenge just to find out who’s who and to get the different people working together.

CTA’s recommendation to create a cabinet committee on the border and/or a specific ministerial or senior bureaucratic position with authority for all aspects of the border is a sound one and deserves consideration.

-Lou Smyrlis can be reached by phone at (416) 510-6881 or by e-mail at lou@TransportationMedia.ca.

Avatar photo

Truck News is Canada's leading trucking newspaper - news and information for trucking companies, owner/operators, truck drivers and logistics professionals working in the Canadian trucking industry.


Have your say


This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.

*