Clogged highways come at a steep cost

Avatar photo

This column would have been completed sooner, but I was stuck in traffic.

There’s nothing unusual about that. Not in the Greater Toronto Area. The commute from my home in the region’s east end to the western office in Etobicoke takes about an hour when everything flows smoothly, and the drive is seldom described in such terms. Rush hour transformed into rush hours many years ago. Construction activity and collisions simply add to the misery, blocking the few available lanes.

To compound matters, Highway 401 is considered the busiest highway in North America. Yay us.

highway congestion
(Photo: istock)

How much does congestion cost?

The challenges of congestion are no secret to those who haul freight for a living – certainly not those who are paid by the mile — but the estimated costs can still be shocking. The Toronto Board of Trade estimates gridlock costs the city about $6 billion a year, but the C.D. Howe Institute says such costs in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area are as much as $11 billion when considering social impacts like helping to ensure people can access jobs that better match their skills.

Toronto is not alone in its misery, even if it is the most congested city in Canada. The American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) reported this October that congestion in the U.S. cost the trucking industry US$94.6 billion in 2021 – up 27% over a six-year period. (To offer some context, the Consumer Price Index rose 12.9% in that time.) Trucks were delayed 1.27 billion hours, the equivalent of parking 460,000 of them for a year.

The issue is clearly more than an inconvenience or fodder for road rage. It saps productivity and brings economic opportunities to a literal standstill. And it certainly hits truck drivers directly in the pocketbook.

And let’s not forget the environmental implications. The ATRI study estimated that the 2021 delays wasted 6.793 billion US gallons (25.7 billion liters) of fuel. Diesel continues to burn even if the wheels on the road fail to turn.

The law of road congestion

The answers are hardly simple, though.

University of Toronto economist Matthew Turner co-authored a study into the “fundamental law of road congestion” in 2009, taking a deep dive into highway data in 1983, 1993 and 2003, along with issues from geography to employment and political factors. Its findings challenged the notion that new or wider highways would solve the problem. The number of vehicle-kilometers that are traveled simply increase proportionally to the kilometers of lanes that are available.

In other words, if you build it, the traffic will come. And congestion will return almost as quickly as the new asphalt can be laid.

Environmental Defense has made a similar case in arguing against plans to build Highway 413 – a route connecting a Highway 401/407 interchange in the west with Highway 400 in Vaughan — suggesting that Ontario would be better served by offsetting truck tolls on the privately owned Highway 407 Express Toll Route north of the city. By its calculations, 30 years of subsidized tolls would still cost less in net present value than the new highway, estimated to cost $6 billion.

It’s a bit of a leap to suggest that new highways are not needed in any growing area. But Turner’s co-authored paper suggested that policymakers might make more headway by focusing on specific bottlenecks rather than trying to justify broad highway expansions.

No matter what asphalt we lay, we can’t overlook the role of public policy and technology in tackling congestion, either. Steps that lead commuters to public transit and carpooling options can ease some of the rush-hour crunch. Shippers and fleets can optimize times and routes by combining vehicle locations and artificial intelligence. Smart traffic signals can adjust recommended speed limits based on road conditions, to keep everything flowing.

There’s no single answer here. We just can’t afford to sit still.

Avatar photo

John G. Smith is Newcom Media's vice-president - editorial, and the editorial director of its trucking publications -- including Today's Trucking,, and Transport Routier. The award-winning journalist has covered the trucking industry since 1995.

Have your say

This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.


  • We need to. Look. At gov money for transit not for electric trucks and heavy duty charger. We need a system to have the work location much closer to the housing and maybe convert 70 percent of some office buildings into to housing for employees that work in that building or a sh9 walking distance
    Ww will still need some new roads and better truck and bus parking
    The gov needs to fund 50 percent of city transit and buss trips under 150 km if able bodies if disabled the gov should cover 75 percent of the cost of the service for road and rail upto 150 km and for medical care
    We also need to stop building single family homes and replace with 10 to 20 stores 2 to 3 bedroom units with rent assist to those that are disabled or have 3 or more children in my opinion. A plan to bring in foreign workers or foreign students is not a good way to keep.a well educated skilled workers in my opinion.

  • No matter the time, the 401 always seems to be jammed up somehow.
    Took 5 hours from Dixie/401 to Napanee the other week. GPS estimated time is 2.5 hours.
    Meanwhile, the electronic boss keeps ticking away your working time.

  • I have confided and suggested in a detailed idea to the Ontario Government how this continuous Congestion and Gridlock could be avoided and overcome but apparently not interested. My thoughts were to create a huge Government Works Project to create and provide a tremendous amount of Work and Employment paying good wages. I suggested and laid out to the Transportation Ministry the creation and construction of a Causeway extending possibly from the area of Fifty Rd. in Stoney Creek to the area of Picketing, Ajax or Whitby. The Water Depth in the Western end of Lake Ontario is not out of the Realm of possibility. All vehicles, especially Trucks coming out of the States heading East of the GTA could avoid the stretch of the QEW and the heavily contested 401. This would definitely overshadow the immensely and overwhelming Gridlock not to mention Monies not lost to Our Economy and the Environment in Idling and Fuel Burn. A Huge Project but hugely beneficial in the long run. Many examples around the World have exhibited the Causeway idea and solution to Transportation Effectiveness.
    Bruce Doyle

  • Buy back the HWY 407, remove Grid lock on the QEW, 403, 401 and 427, payback is amazing, and improves every year.
    Remove the tolls for everyone, improve our productivity dramatically.
    Forget 413 until this is done

    • No a much better solution is to build auto tolls on about 2000 km in ont and 1400 km more in B C from 600 hrs to 2200 hrs Monday thru Saturday and 1300 hrs to 1800 hrs on Sunday at 7 cent for card van under 4000 kg above that 8 cents/ km/ axle and bring in a min local truck driver wage of $25 on payroll and O T R at $31 hr on payroll

  • If the government really cares about the environment they should subsidize tolls for all commercial license plate using the 407ETR to reduce traffic and emissions in the air