CTA urges caution as US scraps GHG Phase 3 emissions rules

Avatar photo

Canada’s trucking industry is urging Ottawa to tread carefully after the United States signaled a major shift in greenhouse gas (GHG) regulations for heavy vehicles.

The Canadian Trucking Alliance (CTA) said the federal government must respond strategically to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to rescind its 2009 Endangerment Finding, which underpins American GHG rules. Eliminating that finding would remove the legal basis for current and planned emissions standards, including Phase III regulations for heavy-duty trucks.

CTA President and CEO Stephen Laskowski warned that diverging regulatory regimes could create cost pressures and uncertainty for fleets and manufacturers operating in an integrated North American market.

The alliance has previously highlighted technological, economic and operational challenges tied to decarbonizing heavy trucks, noting Phase II rules have already strained some vocational fleets. Moving ahead with stricter Canadian requirements while the U.S. retreats could further erode competitiveness, it said.

CTA is calling on Ottawa and Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin to closely align with U.S. policy, reflect current industry conditions in any framework, consult carriers and OEMs on feasible emissions-reduction technologies, and support alternative fuels and transitional solutions.

Laskowski stressed the EPA move does not signal an end to emissions-reduction efforts, but rather an opportunity to craft policies that balance environmental progress with economic and operational realities.

smokestack against blue sky
(Photo: James Menzies)
Avatar photo


Have your say


This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.

*

  • The US and Canada should review the fact that it often takes a 3 or 4 or 5 hour high idle engine run, under load, regeneration process to fix the problem the computer came up with. It should be that you repair the failed item and over time the system should correct itself without the costly regen process.
    Having an engine run a regeneration process for 5 hours to ensure that the repair was completed properly is very counterproductive.