U.S. trucking lobbyists bring wish lists to FMCSA

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Infrastructure investments, including additional truck parking, and the allowance of hair testing by the U.S. DoT were among the items trucking industry lobbyists appealed for, when speaking at the Federal Motor Carrier Administration’s (FMCSA) Truck Safety Summit.

But Lewie Pugh, executive vice-president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) said his group’s wish list hasn’t changed much since it addressed a similar conference 25 years ago.

“Virtually every topic has been discussed before, going back several decades in some cases,” said Pugh. “History demonstrates these issues aren’t going to magically disappear and I sure as hell don’t want to be having this same conversation 25 years from now.”

Pugh began his driving career in 1994 and said the biggest issues facing drivers then, have only gotten worse. This includes a lack of truck parking, poor driver wages, a lack of broker transparency, and detention by shippers and receivers.

The FMCSA, he said, needs to “listen to the professional men and women who make their living behind the wheel.”

He argued the electronic logging device (ELD) mandate has only added stress for drivers, as well as higher costs and additional fatigue. He applauded coming changes to the hours-of-service rules, but feels they don’t go far enough and would like to see 6/4 and 5/5 split sleeper berth options added.

Pugh also said shippers and receivers must be held accountable when keeping drivers waiting to be loaded or unloaded.

The ATA wants to see DoT accept more accurate hair testing for drugs. (Photo iStock)

For its part, the American Trucking Associations (ATA) would like to see greater infrastructure spending – not raised through road tolls – and for the DoT to accept hair testing. ATA CEO Chris Spear also urged government to “get out of the way” of industry-led innovations, such as vehicle-to-vehicle connectivity, which can improve road safety.

Spear pointed out the trucking industry collectively invests more than US$10 billion a year in safety, yet is responsible for only about a third of crashes involving a passenger car and a truck.

Steve Owings, co-founder of Road Safe America, told FMCSA more must be done to limit truck speeds. He pointed to Ontario’s speed limiter mandate as an example of what should be adopted to improve road safety in the U.S.

In Ontario, trucks built since the mid-1990s must be governed to 105 km/h (65 mph). He noted speed differentials – a point of opposition in the U.S. – have proven not to be a danger, and that fatalities involving heavy trucks have declined since the legislation was put in place in 2009. Road Safe America supports having heavy trucks mechanically limited to 65 mph in the U.S, or 70 mph if equipped with automatic emergency braking technologies.

“There’s no capital cost. It just needs to be turned on and used,” he said of speed limiters. “There are dozens of countries around the world with such rules and not one has ever reversed the policy. That’s a pretty strong testimonial to its effectiveness.”

Road Safe America also supports increasing minimum insurance requirements for carriers, which were set in 1980, to better compensate victims of truck crashes.

“Can you think of anything that costs the same today as it cost in 1980?” he said. “It needs to be updated and indexed to something.”

Dan Furth, vice-president of the National Tank Truck Carriers, voiced concern about requirements for dangerous goods haulers to stop at railroad crossings, putting them at risk of being rear-ended. He said the group will collect data from members to see how significant an issue this is. Jim Mullen, FMCSA’s deputy administrator, said the issue is already on the agency’s radar.

When it comes to drug testing, ATA’s Spear said carriers would like the option to use both hair and urine testing methods for DoT testing. The move has been held up by the Department of Health and Human Services and in the White House’s Office of Management and Budget for several years, but Spear said ATA will continue to lobby to have hair testing accepted.

“A number of carriers for more than a decade have been using hair testing effectively,” Spear said. “It’s a proven science, there’s no question about that.”

Furth agreed his membership would be “huge adopters” of hair testing if it became accepted by the DoT.

However, OOIDA’s Pugh took a different view.

“We do have some concerns at OOIDA,” he said, citing technological limitations involving certain ethnicities and hair types.

FMCSA’s Mullen said previously announced changes to hours-of-service rules are still on track to be implemented at the end of September. He also praised the new drug and alcohol clearinghouse, which he said has recorded nearly 30,000 violations since being launched in January.

James Menzies

James Menzies is editor of Today's Trucking. He has been covering the Canadian trucking industry for more than 18 years and holds a CDL. Reach him at james@newcom.ca or follow him on Twitter at @JamesMenzies.

Have your say

We won't publish or share your data

*

  • For one ATA has not been for the American Truckers for years just a bunch of political suck ass .It has been proven over and over again ever since the eld mandate has come into law it has cost more lives than it have saved more drivers in a rush to beat the clock . Why not try this drive a truck for awhile before making a law so you won’t look like a dumb ass.Do away with the eld and save lives in force the laws on the book like knowing how to speak English so you can read a sign and understand it so you go the right way. Do away with the 34 hour and 70 hour rules if you can work a 14 hour day you should be able to do it everyday you all allow a police officer to pull a double shift and they carry a gun talk about a judgment call .and the last get your hands out of my wallet

  • Reducing my options (to either speed up or slow down to avoid running with a “herd” of other vehicles is simply asinine. “Road Safe America” knows this or they should know. Other countries have different infrastructure and perhaps speed limiters work there. But demanding that I “lumber across the Great Plains” like a Conestoga wagon of two centuries ago bunched up with a bunch of ignorant, novice and frankly, unsafe, ATA/TCA drivers is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, @“ROAD SAFE!!!”

    I have 3,000,000 miles of ACCIDENT-FREE experience. Don’t you think it might be wise for the “advocates” of truck safety and the FMCSA to maybe reach out to truckers like me to find out what we do which is beyond obvious, frankly.

    I’m sympathetic to the progenitors of Road SAFE for their loss. But that does not change the fact that they know nothing about which they speak.