Truck driver training schools slam Ontario’s MELT lesson plan deadline extension
Truck driver training schools and industry organizations are pushing back hard against the Ontario Ministry of Transportation’s (MTO) decision to once again extend the deadline for lesson plan compliance in the mandatory entry-level training (MELT) program.
The ministry announced schools now have until July 1, 2026, to submit detailed lesson plans, a move that has sparked widespread frustration.
The Truck Training Schools Association of Ontario (TTSAO) said it is both shocked and deeply disappointed. Philip Fletcher, TTSAO president, noted that while the official bulletin was distributed Sept. 24, media outlets reported the news a day earlier.

“This lack of direct communication leaves many of our member schools who have already devoted countless hours, resources, and significant funds to meet the original compliance requirements feeling undermined and disregarded,” he said.
Fletcher added that TTSAO and other safety organizations were not consulted. He argued a short grace period of two to three weeks would have been reasonable, but a nine-month extension is “excessive” and “rewards non-compliance.”
WTFC urges minister to reverse extension
The Women’s Trucking Federation of Canada (WTFC) also appealed directly to Prabmeet Sarkaria, the transportation minister, to reverse the extension. In a letter, WTFC president Shelley Walker said the decision undermines compliant schools that had already invested in curriculum software, instructor training, upgraded simulators, and other administrative costs.
“Beyond the critical public safety implications, this repeated extension places a significant financial burden on compliant schools during these difficult times,” Walker said. WTFC warned that the delay sends a troubling signal that compliance is optional. The group called for a transparent explanation from the ministry, fast-tracking of early adopters, targeted support for compliant schools, and enforcement measures to deter those exploiting the reprieve.
Frustration among training schools has also been sharp. Jeff McKay, president of Kitchener, Ont.-based Transport Driver Training, said he was “appalled and absolutely disgusted.”
School owner warns lives will be lost
“This extension will cost lives. More lives to add to the growing number of fatalities as a result of the corrupt schools in the truck driver training industry taking shortcuts in training. The bad actors are being protected,” he said.
McKay argued that schools had already been given 10 months to prepare lesson plans, and the new delay simply gives dishonest operators more time to “figure out how to beat the system.” He warned that until rule-breakers and those enabling them are held accountable, unsafe training practices will persist. Each extension, he added, undermines road safety and penalizes schools that have worked hard to meet the requirements.
School says it was not consulted
At Crossroads Truck & Career Academy in Ottawa, director of operations Shea Merriman called the announcement a “serious and concerning setback.” She said the academy, which invested early in compliance, was not consulted and only learned of the extension through media reports.
Merriman stressed that the lack of transparency undermines trust at a time when collaboration is badly needed. For schools working to provide high-quality, safe training, the decision feels like progress is being rolled back, while non-compliant operators gain yet another reprieve. Each delay, she warned, erodes confidence in the system and increases risks on Ontario’s roads.
Have your say
This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.
-
I agree with you we need have better training
We asking from all when 1st bulletin released for lesson plan how many school or association consulted at that time who was behind all of this. Please send me those school location we can visit to them to check what resources and equipment was prepare and how many schools owned by them. Driving school is our business and also bread n butter of our faimly and we not allow anyone to misuse.
Once again those that are vested in an industry, applied their resources in the right direction, complied with the legislation in the proper timelines are basically penalized for playing by the rules. This ministry seems more about good sound bytes and press conferences than actually stepping up and enforcing the rules.
If the schools commenting in the article could come up with proper lesson plans why couldn’t those that are requesting an extension do the same?
If the government is cancelling licenses that are fraudulently obtained that is an excellent sign that a clamp down on the shady training operators needs to be punished as well.
The Ontario governments handling of this is a joke. They don’t really care about highway safety.
Very funny road safety and public saftey affected by lesson plan.? We think it is lot more than that behind the seen. May be this dely effect lot of so called….
Simple question why someone else talk or care about your business. May be their own business is in danger.
Once the license suspension reality will open at that time we will give the statement who is weed in industry.
Leasson plan have noting to do with road or public safety.
Devloper give us price for lesson plan minimum $2000 and maximum $8000. Please use your math.
If 200 plus school pay half the price to mto we can have that for lifetime.
What is wrong with lesson all school submit already and using from last 8 year.
What is new in the standard if not that why only lesson plan need to update.
Some where something wrong.
Please stop to making fool on name of the road and public saftey
Question to all who give their opinion in this artical melt standard started in 2017 since than no change in standard and we are using the lesson plan as per the standard and program approved my mto and mcu. Who is behind all this why last year all of suddenn bulletin issued.
We have approved program and according to that we have lesson why we made new one and certified from third party.
We know the people who is running schools from last 25 year why can’t make their own lesson plan.
Instructor can prepare lesson plan.
Actually lesson plan is not a problem may be something else. Lesson plan is issue to keep busy so called represented.
MELT has not improved road safety. Unskilled drivers are being licensed, and many schools focus on profit instead of quality. The standard was created without consultation from truck schools. It was developed using outdated material and was led by individuals with little or no trucking background. MCU inspectors lack trucking expertise, while DriveTest centres continue to pass underprepared drivers, adding to safety risks. Requiring minute-by-minute driving lesson recording in 18-wheelers is unsafe and impractical. This lesson plan idea is designed not for safe training. Recommendations: Revise the MELT Standard, close gaps and align with real trucking realities. Consult with Schools Only , training schools and experienced instructors must lead curriculum design.
Standardize Curriculum, practical, modern, and consistent across all schools.
Make Curriculum Free, accessible to the public and schools for fairness.
Shift Oversight to MTO, inspectors who have trucking knowledge and experience. Reform DriveTest Practices, ensure licensing reflects real skills and safe operation.
A curriculum is NOT the answer to cheaters cheating the system. The ONLY fix is to have more oversight. I have trained truck driver training for over 30 years. I have owned a school personal in the two major cities in Saskatchewan. To breakdown a learning day minute by minute is impossible while in a moving truck. You cannot break down shifting for even 15 minutes because you will have a corner to teach, a stop sign, lane changes and the list goes on. You cannot break down and put down on paper when the exact same corner changes every second by the vehicles around you, pedestrians, the colour the light is or if it changes as you approach.
In cab training behind the wheel cannot not be written down as a curriculum and even if you could, the only way to correct the problems in the Truck Training Industry is by auditing and oversight. Interviewing students and verifying behind the wheel, backing, circle and brake training is being delivered to the MELT hours standard. Auditing, Oversight, and Physical Testing is the only way to fix this. The time and work put into this by the government is in the wrong direction. A moving truck is not a classroom. A moving truck cannot be taught by academics, it can only be taught by trained professionals with experience behind the wheel.
It’s sad to read this. As a resident of Bolton Ontario and supporter of the CCRSA(Caledon Community Road Safety Association) it is frustrating as the 3 ladies running this are working very hard to stop these kinds of things. They are making some progress but not enough. Pls join their fb group for more details. Thank you
The Ontario government has repeatedly consulted, set revised rules for reform, then delayed and reconsulted over and over. Get on with it. The time to make amendments and begin actual enforcement of the rules to weed out non compliant schools is long overdue. The comments made by those in the article are bang on.