Supreme Court won’t hear wheel-off appeal

Avatar photo

TORONTO, Ont. – Ontario’s wheel-off law has survived another challenge to its constitutionality.

The law denies carriers a due diligence defence in the event of a wheel separation. On April 23, the Supreme Court of Canada denied an application from Transport Robert which sought leave to appeal a wheel-off conviction that the Ontario superior court had previously upheld as being constitutional. The Ontario Trucking Association had supported Robert’s action and is disappointed by the result.

“It is hard to figure,” said OTA president, David Bradley. “The law seems so clearly an affront to natural justice. To say that a carrier is guilty of an offence no matter what measures it took to prevent a wheel separation is very draconian and sets a very concerning precedent.We are not interested in allowing someone who has not practiced due diligence to get off the hook. But sometimes things can happen that you have no control over.”

The number of wheel separation incidents has declined over the past several years, added Bradley, who attributed the decline in better training of wheel installers, improved maintenance practices across the industry and stepped up enforcement.

Avatar photo

Truck News is Canada's leading trucking newspaper - news and information for trucking companies, owner/operators, truck drivers and logistics professionals working in the Canadian trucking industry.


Have your say


This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.

*