UofT study: Trucks pollute disproportionately

by Abdul Latheef

The Near-Road Air Pollution Pilot Study TORONTO, Ont. – A major study released Wednesday suggests that large trucks contribute disproportionately to emissions on Canada’s roads.

The Near-Road Air Pollution Pilot Study was conducted by the Southern Ontario Centre for Atmospheric Aerosol Research at the University of Toronto in collaboration with Environment and Climate Change Canada.

Researchers monitored six stations beside major roads in Vancouver, B.C., and Toronto, Ont., between 2015 and 2017 for the study.

“One-third of Canadians live near major roads and are thus potentially exposed to traffic emissions,” the study said.

Emissions from trucks represent the major source of key pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and black carbon, it added.

“Data for these pollutants indicate that excessive exposure to diesel exhaust can occur near roads with a significant proportion of truck traffic.”

It also noted that nitrogen oxide concentrations are higher on cold winter days, suggesting that the emission control systems for diesel vehicles may not perform well at low temperatures.

The study found that air pollutants associated with vehicles, diesel vehicles in particular, were higher beside roads.

“Heavy truck traffic produced pollutant concentrations beside a major road that were similar to those beside the busiest stretch of highway in North America, despite being lower in car traffic by a factor of 10,” the report said.

It said emission factors were calculated based on measurements over approximately 400 days, consolidating the emissions from 200 million vehicles.

“These emission factors allowed direct comparisons across the three near-road sites (monitored) in terms of the amount of pollutant emitted per kilogram of fuel used by vehicles.”

The study noted that the variability at and across the sites depended more on the proportion of large trucks in the fleet than the total traffic volume.

“Emission factors for over 100,000 individual vehicle plumes also showed that a small portion of the trucks and cars were responsible for the majority of emissions.”

The report added that policies and programs implemented to remove this small fraction of highest-emitting vehicles from populated areas could yield large benefits.

The publication of the report coincided with a move by the Ontario government to take tougher actions against those who tamper with the emission control systems on trucks.

Under a proposal unveiled this week, the government would enforce stricter rules, starting 2021.

Combined safety and emissions inspections would be required annually, starting when a vehicle is first registered in Ontario. Part of the inspection will require a physical and electronic emissions system-tampering test.

Truckers have long complained about the problem-plagued emissions aftertreatment systems (ATS), which are mandatory on all new rigs.

They say qualified ATS technicians are few and far between, and owners are forced to tow their trucks to dealerships to fix minor problems on the supersensitive ATS sensors.

Industry lobbying groups have been calling for a crackdown on service providers who offer to remove the emission control systems and reprogram the engine to make it more “fuel efficient.”

On Tuesday, the Ontario Trucking Association said the government’s latest initiative will make Ontario the leader in North America for enforcing heavy truck emissions rules.

In 2014, about 23% greenhouse gas emissions in Canada came from the transportation sector, and heavy-duty vehicles accounted for about 8% of total GHG emissions.

Have your say

This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.


  • Question the accuracy and perameters of the studies. As most trucks are near zero emissions and must pass frequent emission test.

  • Seems like a little bit of a witch hunt to me for the 8% that heavy trucks produce…. What is the government doing about the other 92%, and where are the carbon tax dollars really going?

  • In time the Newer diesel trucks will replace the big polluter trucks. DPF systems have improved greatly, and with that fuel mileage too!

  • Having just read the article about the U of T study on vehicle pollution, I dont understand why a paper such as yours,which should stand up for O/O and trucking companies,would use a headline that is certain to reinforce the negative perceptions that the public already have.
    Further in the article it states that the majority of pollution comes from a small number of cars and trucks, this fact should have been the main point.

    • … and on top of that the data set is outdated by almost 3 to 5 years.
      Why would a responsible publication, transportation related or not, even give any credence to such a poorly constructed report that has absolutely nothing to do with the situation as it is today?
      If it’s filler that Truck News needs, print a weather report.

  • Its time we gave in. Trucks are bad. Lets ban them altogether, do away with them. The public thinks we are nothing but a nuisance anyways. We can all get jobs at variety stores. Oh wait…we would have nothing to wear and nothing to sell.
    Oh well.