Truck News


All Is Not As Good As It Seems At The Border

Two-thirds (by value) of Canada's trade with the US moves by truck. So, I often get asked the question: 'How are things at the border these days?'

Two-thirds (by value) of Canada’s trade with the US moves by truck. So, I often get asked the question: ‘How are things at the border these days?’

Before answering that, it is important to understand that North America – especially its manufacturing regions – has been in a freight recession for at least two years.

Initially, the reduction in freight volumes – particularly a drop-off in southbound shipments – reflected the impact from the appreciation in the value of the Canadian dollar, and ongoing problems in the auto and forestry sectors. What had been the Canadian truckers’ traditional head-haul, and the major source of the industry’s growth over the previous 20 years, has been drying up. The onset of the financial meltdown and a worldwide recession has only served to exacerbate what had been underway for some time.

Figures supplied by the Public Border Operators Association show that in February 2009, the number of trucks crossing between Ontario and the US continued to spiral downward. Compared to a year ago, truck crossings were down 35% at the Ambassador Bridge, 28% at the Blue Water Bridge and 17% at the Peace Bridge. In 2008, total truck crossings were 10% below where they were in 2001.

It is no surprise to truckers that Canada finds itself in a trade deficit situation. In 2007, for the first time in decades, the number of trucks coming into Canada exceeded the number heading to the US. In 2008, US imports from Canada by truck declined by 6% over 2007, according to the US DoT, whereas US exports to Canada by truck were up a modest 2.4%. The trend continues in 2009 and there is virtually no indication that a recovery in freight is on the near-term horizon. This is as good a harbinger for overall economic activity as you can find.

Moreover, the current slowdown in trade is masking problems arising out of the ‘thickening’ of the Canada/US border that has been occurring over the past number of years, in large part reflecting a series of measures introduced by the US in the name of enhanced security.

No fewer than a dozen major US security programs have been introduced since 9/11. Other factors have also contributed such as infrastructure limitations (the Detroit-Windsor crossing being a prime example), inconsistency between US and Canadian programs, staffing issues and no doubt an element of US protectionist sentiment.

So, with cross-border truck traffic down, we are currently not experiencing the kinds of extended delays that have at times plagued the border in recent years. However, despite the drastic drop-off in volumes, border processing times have not improved. I am concerned that when the economy bottoms out, and growth resumes, there will be a return to extended border delays.

I’m not sure where the tipping point is, but continued heaping of costs on transportation and trade is a serious threat to the competitiveness of North American-made goods and direct investment to North America. Anything that impairs the efficiency, productivity and reliability of the North American supply chain will have significant ramifications for both economies, given the high level of integration.

Recently, the new US Secretary of Homeland Security commented on the northern border. Frankly, she did not say anything we did not already know – ie. there is a cultural change underway that underpins the creation of a “real” border. Anyone who has been remotely involved in border issues since 9/11 knows that. As Canadians, our concern should be what additional measures will be introduced on top of what has already been done over the past eight years to create that “real” border.

The secretary’s remarks seem to indicate what has been done to date is not enough. She says we should strive not to impact on trade but to not “unduly” impact trade. She talks about trying to avoid “an unnecessary division between our security responsibilities and our trade and travel desires.”What is her definition of “unduly” and “unnecessary”?

Is Canada positioned to deal with this challenge? I do not for a minute underestimate how complex the matter of Canada-US relations is. However, the Canadian approach of recent years has been to diffuse.

Too many federal departments have had some stake or responsibility for some aspect of the border. It is a challenge just to find out who’s who and to get the different parties working together. In recent years, I have had numerous ministers indicate to me that they were in charge of the border. No doubt each was responsible for some element, but no one it seemed was really in charge. The Security and Prosperity Partnership while initially well-intentioned has been underwhelming in its results.

A new approach is required including the creation of a Cabinet committee on the border and/or a specific ministerial or senior bureaucratic position with authority for all aspects of the border. Second, we need to engage the Americans in a new Smart Border Accord.

Ironically, the most productive period for advancing border issues occurred in the first few months following 9/11, culminating in the Smart Border Accord of 2001.

We have to know what we want and bring solutions to the table. Just saying trade is important is not enough. We need to put meaningful and practical solutions forward – solutions that on their own might not seem like much but which in combination might actually help facilitate border crossings.

– David Bradley is president of the Ontario Trucking Association and CEO of the Canadian Trucking Alliance.

Truck News

Truck News

Truck News is Canada's leading trucking newspaper - news and information for trucking companies, owner/operators, truck drivers and logistics professionals working in the Canadian trucking industry.
All posts by

Print this page

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *