Have Humboldt’s lessons been forgotten or ignored?
Eight years have passed since Jaskirat Singh Sidhu ran through a stop sign near Armley, Sask., before colliding with the Humboldt Broncos tour bus on its way to a hockey game.
The field adjacent to the intersection, once strewn with bales of peat moss, the wreckage of a bus split into three pieces, twisted remnants of a tractor-trailer, and the passengers’ personal belongings is now a memorial; a poignant reminder of lives taken or irrevocably changed on that April afternoon.
One of those souls was 18-year-old Evan Thomas. His father, Scott, took part in a discussion last week during the National Recruiting and Retention Symposium in Burlington, Ont. I applaud him for speaking from his heart to a roomful of trucking insiders. That was brave.

A personal account
“Evan would have been 26 now,” he began. “His friends are all getting married. They got their big-boy jobs. We’ve got four weddings to attend this summer. He was a good kid, you know. A phenomenal student. His brain was his best asset. And he happened to be a good athlete.”
Evan was a rookie on the Humboldt Broncos hockey team. Traditionally, the rookies ride at the front of the bus, Thomas told the audience.
“Evan was near the front. He was standing, putting his suit on, when the accident happened. He had no chance. He was standing adjusting his tie when [Sidhu] blew through the stop sign,” Thomas recalled.
Still, Thomas has managed to forgive Sidhu for what happened to his son. “Clearly, he didn’t intend for that to happen. He was just a guy in a bad spot,” Thomas said of Sidhu.
The two met and talked following the marathon victim impact statement portion of the proceedings against Sidhu in early 2019. Thomas was alerted that Sidhu wanted to speak with him, so they met in private for 15 or 20 minutes.
“It was me and him, his cousin and his uncle. [When we met] he fell down on his knees and grabbed my hands and started crying into my hands. I picked him up and hugged him. My shirt was wet with his tears, and I just said, ‘What happened?’
“Forgiveness was the easiest path forward for me. To hang on to anger and hatred takes a lot of energy,” he said. “It would be different if his intention was to cause harm. That would be a much more difficult conversation. But that wasn’t his intention.”
Thomas characterized Sidhu as “just a guy in a bad spot.” He said he believed Sidhu had been taken advantage of by his employer and was probably under pressure to get the job done.
“He was stressed and lost, and I felt bad for the guy, so I wanted to talk to him,” he said. “He was a broken man.”
Thomas’ words rekindled my feelings about this tragedy. I wrote about this shortly after Sidhu pleaded guilty to all the charges against him. Like Thomas, I also felt Sidhu was a guy in a bad spot.
But there’s more.
The record shows Sidhu had taken about a week of training before some licensing examiner in Alberta signed off on his competency. We have little to go on in determining how good or bad a driver he was, except for the anecdotal evidence of his inability to reverse a B-train and the litany of errors inspectors found after the fact in his logbook and vehicle inspection reports.
As I noted at the time, and still believe, running a stop sign is a grievous error, but it’s not synonymous with inadequate training. If not for the cosmically bad timing of having a hockey bus and tractor-trailer in the same place at the same time, we’d probably never have heard of Jaskirat Singh Sidhu.
But that incident sure brought the driver training issue into sharper focus.
MELT to the rescue?
Following the incident, industry and government leveraged the crash to gain wider implementation of mandatory entry-level training (MELT) programs, which Ontario had implemented 10 months earlier. The crash dramatically accelerated national adoption, with most other provinces following Ontario’s lead, albeit with local flavor.
While MELT has its detractors, several driving school operators I respect, including Don MacDonald, chairman of the Professional Truck Training Alliance of Canada (PTTAC), and Andy Roberts of Castlegar, B.C.’s Mountain Transport Institute, insist MELT works well when it’s done properly. But often it’s not.
We’ve all seen the scams and fraud perpetrated by shady driving schools. Those poorly trained, barely competent drivers are still out there, and many of those shady schools are still in business.
MELT was supposed to fix this. It hasn’t. The question is, why not?
Lessons forgotten or ignored?
To answer this question, we have to stop looking at Humboldt as a one-off tragedy. What if, instead, we see it as a proxy for many of the major issues plaguing our industry – issues no government seems to have the will to deal with?
For instance, every day – MELT or no MELT – truck drivers emerge from driving schools no better equipped to handle the daily challenges than Sidhu was.
Every day, provincial driving examiners certify candidates as competent, even while knowing those candidates are simply delivering rehearsed, scripted answers.
Those inadequately trained and barely competent drivers then often wind up working for fly-by-night carriers. There they are mercilessly exploited, underpaid and put into situations they are ill-equipped to handle.
Shady insurance brokers sell insurance with out-of-province registrations to bottom-feeder carriers who would never be insured by legitimate brokers.
Carriers who should have been shut down and locked up merely change their names and relocate to another jurisdiction when enforcement turns up the heat. Some even keep collections of magnetic signs in their jockey boxes, like so many bottles of windshield washer, each bearing the name of one bogus company or another.
We have companies selling annual inspection stickers to fleets whose equipment belongs in a scrap yard. And we have legitimate safety-focused carriers going out of business because they can’t compete with these rate-cutting bottom-feeders.
None of this is secret. We all know it’s happening.
A deeper truth
Thomas continued his story. Sidhu, he reminded us, appeared in court Jan. 8, 2019, and took full responsibility for his actions, sparing his victims’ families the agony of a trial.
He stood and addressed the courtroom, saying, “It happened because of my lack of experience.”
Asked if he believed Sidhu was qualified to be driving that truck (a flatdeck B-train) that day, Thomas was emphatic: “Not at all.
“He did the bare minimum to get his ticket. He had been employed by that company for two weeks when his employer [Sukhmander Singh, owner of Adesh Deol Trucking] sent him on his first trip outside the city of Calgary. In conversations I had after the crash, I learned the people, where he loaded the peat moss, had to back his truck up. He didn’t know how to do it. He was lost, in over his head, and he had no idea what he was doing.”
And so it is with many newly minted CDL holders. Learning the basics in a MELT program is just the start.
When I started driving almost 40 years ago, I often found myself in well over my head. Just like Sidhu.
I’ll never forget the terror I felt pulling A-train tankers through winter storms in Northern Ontario – even with two years of experience behind me. Fortunately for me, more experienced drivers coached and cajoled me into getting the job done without hurting anyone.
Today, it seems, we prefer shooting YouTube video of their follies rather than stepping in to help.
Learning how to be a professional driver is scary as hell, and it’s much worse when you don’t have a supportive company behind you. Sidhu faced all those challenges on his own – and soon became the poster boy for everything wrong with driver training.
They don’t know what they don’t know
It’s pure supposition on our part, but based on personal experience, PTTAC’s MacDonald and I agreed Sidhu was likely pretty rattled following his loading experience and having to re-tarp the load at the side of the road not long after leaving the plant.
His lawyer said during a court appearance that Sidhu had become focused on a billowing tarp as he was approaching the intersection where he’d eventually meet the bus taking the Humbolt Broncos to their hockey game.
If Sidhu’s self-admitted lack of experience played a pivotal role in the crash itself, it was not in failing to appreciate the meaning of the stop sign. More likely, he was consumed with doubt about the job he had done with the tarps, and second-guessing what he might have done differently.
MacDonald and I discussed this too, and we both concluded it’s entirely possible he was mentally preoccupied, maybe replaying those early events in his head as he rolled inexorably along. Each of us had done exactly that more times than we cared to remember
“Employers need to realize that the people coming out of MELT don’t have it all, not even close,” Thomas observed near the end of the session. “There’s a huge responsibility, I think, on the employer’s part to make sure their employees are adequately trained. Our public roads are probably the biggest workspace in Canada. They are the same roads my daughter drives on, and my son’s hockey bus drove on.”
Sidhu’s employer walked away from this with a $5,000 fine. The company was issued an unsatisfactory rating on Nov. 8, 2018. That’s the final entry on the company’s public profile with Alberta Transportation.
There’s no record of anyone with the same name having started a new trucking company in Alberta. But because of the antiquated and fragmented way we deal with trucking regulatory issues in Canada, it’s nearly impossible to tell if they might be back in business elsewhere.
Those who needed to hear message were missing
Thomas certainly had the attention of everyone in the room. But he was preaching to the choir. Those attending the discussion were companies and people concerned with and working to improve safety.
The people who really need to hear his message – the politicians, the regulators, and the miscreant driving schools, insurance companies and carriers – were AWOL.
“I think most people are good employers trying to do good things, but there’s some out there that aren’t,” Thomas acknowledged. “There’s lots of evidence about the whole Driver Inc. thing and all those other Adesh Deols that are just running people through the mill. I don’t know that we’re any better off than we were eight years ago. Just last winter in Saskatoon we had four overpasses hit by semis driving with loads they didn’t know what was on the back of the truck. To me, that’s partly the driver’s responsibility, but somebody in that company had to know [the height of what they were hauling] and where they were going. How does that happen?”
While hockey sticks still adorn porches all across the country this time of year, governments just sidestep some of our more pressing problems Humboldt helped bring to light: the insurance and immigration scammers, the chameleons, the rate cutters, the willfully ignorant examiners, Driver Inc. and the mechanisms that enable all this mayhem.
The good guys are trying, but the industry cannot rid itself of this cancer. The rules have got to change.
Have your say
This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.
Bravo Scott!
Thankyou for writing this story,
It is so easy to condemn the crazy drivers on the road, and yet we all know that some of them are the victims of circumstances. Who is responsible for enforcing the rules that should prevent most of these tragedies? Why are there not more stories about how broken the enforcement is? We have reached a point where 30 – 40% of inspections result in OOS, how did we get here?
This whole incident resonates with me.
I have two family members on memorials who were killed at work.
My great grandfather killed in 1929 during the construction of the Welland Canel when he was crushed by a truck loaded with cement who’s parking brake had failed and my brother, a police officer shot and killed prior to a training session by another highly trained police officer.
I know very little about my great grandfathers event, if there was an investigation or any corrections required after the fact.
For my brother is was a very high profile event where it was easier to blame the dead person that did nothing wrong and had no voice than it was to hold all those accountable to what lead up to his death.
For the Humboldt crash, there were many layers of blame that were covered up because it was easier to blame one person than expose all those who had accountability, yet had the power to cover their involvement.
Are we any better off today, absolutely NOT. MELT was more of a distraction and a quick fix than a proper resolution to the cause.
Company owners with political influence continue to allow the negligence to secure the profits at the expense of endangering the good people we share the roads with knowing their accountability can and will be covered up when the next catastrophic crash happens.
As another take on this, should we also be looking at the shipper? If the trucking company does not cross into the USA, it may be hard to find much public information on the trucking company. If they are in the Usa we have the saferweb to search through to see what kind of record they have, maybe we need a Canadian version?
Bad trucking companies keep going because shippers load them, and the cheapest rate wins. If shippers were also held to a standard and were liable also because the rate they accepted was below market value or less than it cost to go from A to B? These are ideas, having spent 40 years in the industry there have been massive changes, and we do not have drivers from the same Farming/construction background. As an instructor, I see that the change and passing the test is not enough. We need trucking companies to also add to the training when hiring new drivers, supplying mentors, and not just having them sign 50 pages of forms they do not have to to understand. MELT is a good start but without enforcement or ongoing training by an employer, it will not be enough.
-
Nobody should be allowed to drive an 8 axle truck with a week or two of training. There should be a graduated licensing system starting with a three axle truck and work your way up to the next level after you have a certain amount of experience and can pass the next level of exams, much like a trade. Trucking should be a red seal trade. I know there are people in every trade that do poor quality work but electricians, for example, have a a pretty good record of not causing electrical accidents because they have the proper training and certification. Why don’t we have this standard for truckers.
By the way, I don’t buy the flapping tarp story.
I am curious.
What does running a stop sign and being preoccupied with something else ( billowing tarp) have to do with MELT???
A stop sign means STOP no matter what vehicle you are operating.
Blow thru it = NOT GOOD
Not having your mind on the job of driving, whether it be for a billowing tarp or checking your phone,changing a radio station/CD= NOT GOOD
Sure it takes more skill to operated a CMV )( and especially a train) but the issues here are basic ones that are taught in beginners Drivers’ Ed when you get a learners’ permit.
Say I am driving along in my personal vehicle ( not a CMV) and I blow thru a stop sign because I am preoccupied with looking at my hands free phone and cause an accident that kills one ( or more) people..
What excuse is there to whitewash this incident??
I can understand if there was an issue with the way the CMV was operated ( unable to reverse, can not make a turn, unable to gear down if applicable, improper use of brakes ( going too fast an having to lock them up), not keeping in the lane etc) but the fact of blowing thru the stop sign and being preoccupied does not reflect on MELT..
Or have I missed something??
-
John, that is my point exactly. What does running a stop sign have to do with driver training? Yet, many parties with a stake in this used the Humboldt crash as leverage to get MELT programs rolled out across Canada. As I noted in the column, MELT is a step in the right direction when it’s done as intended, but often it’s not. And as sure as the day is long, drivers are coming out of MELT programs today no better trained that Mr. Sidhu was.
I would never presume to know what it feels like to have your child brutally and suddenly taken from this world. From reports in the media about the families and friends of the Humboldt crash victims, coping comes in many forms. That said, if responsibility for this tragic and preventable event doesn’t start with Mr. Sidhu where does it start? There are many things that could have been done differently to avoid the terrible outcome at that Saskatchewan crossroads but every contributing factor does not remove Mr Sidhu’s duty of care.
I dont even need to read this entire article to answer the question posed.
You would have thought, by now, that some mother, father, grand mother, grand father, uncle or aunt in our Government would see the pain in Scott Thomas’s eyes and use that love for son lost, to do some good!
To pledge that not another father, mother, grand father, grand mother, aunt or uncle would have to endure what must be daily torture.
Alas we find ourselves in exactly the same spot if not worse.
They answer is simple and attainable. 6 mobile MTO Officers specifically trained in the MTO Class A Truck Training Standards.
The ability to write tickets on the spot, to inspect equipment and pull plates, to review equipment maintenance schedules and instructor qualifications. To review student files for compliance to the published standard and ensure that students have actually met the published objectives for each learning category.
Currently we have the 401, a posted speed limit and no OPP out there enforcing the rules of the road. That is what the Ontario truck training landscape looks like today.
Humboldt was more than any parent needed to realize the changes that were required to the truck training industry.
As it is today there has been lots of talk and what change has come, has come way too slow and infrequent to make any kind of impact.
One would almost think, based on so little meaningful change after the deaths of so many, that we as a society accept under trained commercial drivers as the norm on Canadian roads!
What other conclusion would you draw with so little action from those that could have, and still can, surrounded Evan’s death (and all those who perished or were injured) with meaning.
John, you’re right that running a stop sign is basic — nobody needs Class 1 training to know what a stop sign means. But treating the Humboldt crash as a single moment at the intersection misses how it actually happened.
We don’t know for certain what distracted Sidhu — the tarp explanation is supposition, as the article notes. But whatever it was, the intersection had advance warning signs, oversize signage, and rumble strips, all installed because heavy trucks need earlier preparation than cars do. A trained driver with real hours behind the wheel is far less likely to miss those cues. A driver with effectively zero supervised highway time is exactly who you’d expect to miss them.
So yes, MELT is supposed to cover load security and hazard recognition. The problem is it doesn’t go far enough, and what’s on paper doesn’t match what’s delivered. 104.5 hours is short, and the schools running the programs are largely left to their own devices. Every MELT graduate has “learned” tarping in the sense that it’s checked off a sheet. Almost none have thrown a tarp fifty times in varying weather with a trainer correcting them. The regulator audits paperwork, not muscle memory.
The real fix is to stop treating commercial driving as a short-course endorsement and start treating it as the skilled occupation it is. A two-year college diploma — administered by a recognized institution, provincial oversight, standardized curriculum, qualified instructors, and well over a thousand hours of supervised driving and trade content. Quebec already does roughly this through the DEP en transport par camion.
There’s also a structural fit nobody talks about. We can’t send drivers across the U.S. border until age 21, and the insurance industry mostly won’t touch them until then either. Right now that’s three years the industry mostly wastes — kids either take MELT and run local on light work that doesn’t prepare them for what’s coming, or they take a different job at 18, get used to the paycheque, and never come back. That’s a big chunk of the “driver shortage” right there, self-inflicted. A two-year diploma starting at 18 means a graduate is 20, finishes a year of intra-provincial running with real training behind them, and hits 21 ready for the border. And the insurance side becomes a much easier conversation when underwriters are looking at a verifiable, standardized credential instead of a 104-hour certificate from one of 200 schools of unknown quality. We’d be turning dead time into a pipeline — catching kids at the high school exit while they’re still considering options, instead of trying to talk a 25-year-old out of a paycheque to go back to school.
It costs more and takes longer. But the current model externalizes the cost onto the public every time one of these crashes happens, and onto the families in the other vehicle. Humboldt wasn’t a freak event — it was the predictable output of a system that puts drivers with effectively zero supervised highway hours into Super Bs and dispatches them solo. The stop sign part is basic. The system that put him there isn’t.
As over the road driver when I went from a semi driver to driving a super b I was not that confident in my driving skills I felt that there should be a gradual change in my driving license go from one GVW to the next level you learn on one level and then you go to the level on the West Coast driving schools never see the mountains and they get tested on flat roads then they are sent up into the mountains with a super bee never see one before that’s my thought entirely keep up the good work J
Hi Jim-The provincial government of Ontario is as guilty as sidhu. 60 years in the trucking industry, I’ve held many positions and never seen the insanity of the last 30 years. Thanks
It has just about been forgotten. A lot of bad drivers out there still, corner cutting schools offering cheap training, unsafe equipment.
Deportation was part of the sentence. Circumventing that does not complete the sentence as imposed by the Courts.
If he wishes, he can take his family, that I believe he did not have at the time of the crash, with him and build a new life there.
All the rules are in place. All the laws exist. There is no enforcement. How can I bold, highlight or make that last sentence flash? How about this, THERE IS NO ENFORCMENT!!! A once-a-year blitz putting close to half the equipment out of service isn’t going to force a driver or the owner of a trucking company in a position of education and change. They’ll pay the fine and tap their hat and say, ‘see ya next year’. We need more inspections, more citations for wrongdoing, more audits and more driver’s licenses and company authorities rescinded for lack of action.
If the government, the authorities and the judges are not serious about it then what other result can you expect?